Maybe, probably not

[gunner]

I watched a show on Nessie yesterday before napping, they had sonar and went from one end to the other looking for something big enough on sonar to be nessie. It was a pretty fucking lame show actually, but kind of interesting. THere were quite a few people talking about seeing the monster, but scotland, scotch, I have seen some monsters while drinking also. I am going for no Nessie, I have seen a number of other shows and there just isnt enough to lead me to believe it. But like any other unknown subject, I dont know for sure.

I did find this on the most recent nessie activity, kinda short, but pretty interesting. http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea ... d=28151905 (http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=28151905)

[Yo Mama]

Logic pretty much rules out the existence of a monster in Loch Ness. All the famous photos have turned out to be hoaxes. Not only that, but it would be an awfully long-lived creature if it is just one of them, and if there were enough for a breeding population, I think there'd be a lot more credible evidence.

Methinks the Scotch whiskey has more to do with it than anything.

[garretjax]

i would love to believe there is something down there but the chances in my eyes are very slim to non existant, even if you take away the massive amounts of food even 1 thing that size would need to survive, there simply is not enough credible evidence for me

[mojo]

Im also in the probably not camp.
One interesting thing that i did read about, cant remember
where, was the thought that it could be a deep sea species of
marine animal that makes its way into the Loch from time to
time through underground sea connections.

Im not sure if there is in fact any evidence for these lakes/loch's
being connected to the sea in any way.

It would make more sense than a creature living there all the
time though.

mojo

[Martian Exile]

I believe in the Lock Ness Monster, because it’s FUN to believe in the Lock Ness Monster!